Saturday, September 30, 2006

"The Milk Man, The Paper Boy..."

Full House reruns make me smile. And on a related note, Designing Women is coming to Nick at Night. Oh, great glory and splendor!

I realize that I'm a graduate student and should probably be, you know, studying all of the time, but there are certain things I won't give up for any lifestyle and late-night sitcom watching is one of them.

Thursday, September 28, 2006

A Few Notable Things:

1. I think I'm becoming addicted to blogging.
2. The Van Gogh painting at the top of my blog keeps disappearing and then reappearing. Spooky!
3. My Left Nutmeg is great. I like the voice: smart but a bit quirky, a little edgy. It's so damn readable. It hums my political tune, so to speak, which makes me wonder: is that why I like it so much? If yes, then there must be some truth to what we discussed in class about DailyKos (and many political blogs) just preaching to the choir. Maybe that's not so bad, though. Maybe if you preach to the choir, you can get them to do even more than they would ordinarily do. Plus, there's not only strength numbers, but comfort as well. It's just plain old nice to communicate with people from different stations in life who share your opinions. Besides, I'm sure some right-winged folks drop in every now and then, just as I watch Fox News every now and then to get pissed off.
4. This timeline is helpful. I know, I know. I said that blog is kind of dull, which I still believe, but dull can be educational.
5. Lattes rock my socks off.

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

$1.75, Please

I'm one of those people who obsessively loves coffee, but I'm also one of those people who has a sensitive stomach. I've tried and tried to quit coffee, but I keep coming back for various reasons: I smell it and suddenly need it; I have to stay up late to study; I have to function at an unholy hour (any time before 10:00 AM)...

Today's reason for relapse: Structuralist literary theory. Tell me how I'm supposed to tackle this without coffee?

By the way, I know Folgers has that easy-on-the-stomach coffee now, but there is nothing (nothing!) like my Dunkin.

Labels:

The Passion of the Blog

My DD said that blogs are "filling a demand for normalcy in politics, for anti-elitist open discussion." I do think blogging opens the door for discussion, but I don't know how anti-elitist it is. I mean, look at DailyKos. Sure, it's popular and yes, there's lots of commenting and discussing, but it's a Democratic blog (or is it better called a blog community?) with a stringent set of rules. There's a flow to it and I'd bet that those who try to swim against the current would be squashed pretty quickly. I think most political blogs are like that, and even though I wouldn't call them anti-elitist, I would call them interesting. I think bloggers who are all pumped up about an issue or a campaign or, say, The X-Files, are the most readable. Because there's passion, and people are attracted to that and then join in, and the passion grows. The attempt at a bipartisan blog was kind of dull, if you ask me.

I do think blogs are useful in politics, and I think -- as My DD was trying to say -- they bring politics away from that imagined sphere of white wigs and high horses and down to the people, down to daily life (which is what it's really about). In that way, I think blogging is a wonderful thing. The Lieberman and Lamont campaign, though important, probably wouldn't have garnered as much attention if it weren't for these passionate bloggers (yes, even the "choke on these numbers!!!" dude).

Labels: ,

Tuesday, September 26, 2006

Gender Bender

I drove home last night thinking about whether the blogosphere is male dominated and whether blogs are equally conducive to male and female thought.

Since blogging can be anonymous and profiles can be falsely populated, I imagine it's difficult to conduct research on who blogs what, how many men have blogs, how many women, etc. Having done no research at all and having no right to make this assumption, I'm going to say that bloggers who blog frequently and blogs with heavy traffic are often written/owned by men. I only say this because it has been my experience (as a new blog surfer/lurker) that many of the popular blogs I've seen and many of the blogs featured in news stories I've read are written by men. This is not to say that men greatly outweigh the number of women with blogs, but...I just have a feeling. So that'll have to do for now. Until I can dig up some research (that will probably end up proving me wrong).

Anyway. The point I want to reach is this: I think blogging is an ideal medium for women, and more specifically, for feminism. Blogging is communal; it sparks discussion and new ideas; it can be inspirational or motivational; it can be confessional; it can be political; it's often heated; it can attract attention, both negative and positive; it can be creative. These things are true of feminism as well. The two seem a perfect pair.

More on this, probably, but I'm at work. And besides, there's homework to do.

Labels: , ,

Sunday, September 24, 2006

In Which I Don't Get the Right Answer...

I've been asked to think about codes in terms of the blogs I've read. Hm. Damn good idea, but I'm not sure I know where to begin, or if I'll get anywhere worth being once I begin.

First, it seems that blogs do indeed have codes, and that just as codes vary from culture to culture, they also vary from blog to blog. I love Nonsense's blog, and he seems to have certain codes for certain words/topics. President Bush = negative, Jewish culture = respectful humor. Certain words or phrases have come to mean certain things for him, he writes with his own code, his own personal meaning. You know?

Less about codes, and more about memes, I was re-thinking about Kottke's blog, which seems -- in itself -- a meme machine. It pumps out loads information, and since Kottke has a bigger following than many blogs, he spreads the information too. Are all blogs meme machines? I want to say yes, but feel hesitant to do so. Maybe they are all spreading information, but Nonsense's and Coffee's blogs seem less about spreading/making memes and more about blending personal anecdotes with external things (politics, movies, etc.). Kottke, on the other hand, is "heavy on the links," and on random information, so I tend to put him above the other two in terms of meme-ing (I made that up). Interestingly, I prefer Nonsense and Coffee to Kottke.

Labels:

Saturday, September 23, 2006

Reptiles

The interview with Clotaire Rapaille was of particular interest to me for two reasons: 1) I love the study of language, of the meanings and emotions we associate with certain words, and of the simultaneously freeing and restrictive nature of language ; and 2) Before heading back to graduate school, I worked for two years in an Association for marketing and opinion researchers.

It's a little off-putting to think of our brains as reptilian, but I agree with Rapaille's idea that "when we [are] born, we have the reptilian brain" that concerns itself with survival. Then, development brings us to the "limbic" stage, which involves emotions, relationships and connections. Lastly, we come to the "cortex" stages, which -- as I understood it -- is the "thinking" stage, the "smart" stage, where we analyze and synthesize and all the other "izes."

Rapaille mentions that market researchers limit themselves by focusing too much on the cortex, on the thinking of consumers, and not on the reptilian (and limbic, too, I suppose) nature of consumers. So, I started thinking about something I buy regularly, a product that I love: Coca Cola. Now, at first, I could say, "I like the taste," but my drive to purchase it does, I think, come from my code for that word, which is familial. My mother and my grandparents we big Coke drinkers, letting the young ones have sips (we'd have to drink milk with dinner). As I grew older, I developed a sort of loyalty to Coke. I know this is a very simple example, but with it, I can see that what drives me to buy certain products is more than my "thinking." It's deeper than that.

Thinking about the spread of information in this way and about the codes we have for words (and how they vary from culture to culture) seems important, almost revolutionary (if you have not thought of this before).

I think Rapaille should speak at one of MRA's Conferences.

Labels:

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Future of Feminism

I just found this really interesting article about the large number of people who have blogs (and myspace pages, etc.) and who use the internet regularly, and what that means for feminism.

I like that Gugelmeyer recognizes that the internet is a shifty place, tracking personal information and promoting consumer spending, but also acknowledges that it is a place of connection, of unity. If so many people are using it and communicating through it, then the feminist movement should be actively participating in "social networks, blogs, email and all the tools of the internet."

I wonder how the face of feminism will change in this new century, and what part blogs will play in the change?

Labels: , ,

Memes (Clever title, eh?)

As I read the wikipedia entry on memes, it -- at first -- seemed to me that memes and ideas were synonymous. I kept thinking of a meme as an intangible mental gene, passed down (or around) via the brain. That sounded a lot like an idea to me, only viewed from a more sophisticated and scientific perspective. Apparently, this has been one of the criticisms of memes, memetics and meme theories: "no reason exists for differentiating or discerning the word 'meme' from the word 'idea' or from the phrase 'pattern of thought'." In response, the meme people say, "The creation of the term 'meme' as opposed to 'idea' or 'pattern of thought' allows for specific description and application of the meme as a phenomenon. Additionally, using a new term such as 'meme' allows one to avoid semantic baggage associated with well-known terms such as 'idea'; and conveys a (mistaken) connotation of novelty."

I still wasn't sure that I bought it, even though I agree that words are loaded with "semantic baggage" and using a new word allows for a more intense, less inhibited exploration of the meaning behind the word. Though I'm still not sure that a) memes are much different from ideas or b) I have any idea what I'm talking about, this list got me thinking. Those things aren't exactly what I would call "ideas." For instance, one of the items on the list is "internet slang." Internet slang seems to have started somewhere (not really as an idea or invention, but rather, as a shortened method of communication for internet-savvy folks) and spread rapidly and widely, developing word by word, phrase by phrase. To me, this is the epitome of a meme. And considering this, I now see that there is a distinction between memes and ideas (even if I can't clearly identify it).

In other news, memetic engineering is kind of creepy, no?

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

Blogger by Nature?

OK. Since class ended on Monday, I've been thinking about the question of why bloggers blog, and more specifically, way so many bloggers blog?

I do think there's some truth to the idea that we (humans) are information-sharing animals, that we have innate need to spread information, knowledge and ideas. In fact, I think this is the best explanation I've heard for why so many bloggers blog.

Why do I blog? I spent some time thinking about whether this is the same as asking myself why I write. For me, the writing (moreso than blogging) comes from an innate need, from my inborn inability to communicate well in a common way: by speaking. For me, it has always been easier to write something down than to say it. Sometimes I'm not even sure that my emotions actually register, or if I can identify them, until I've written about them. So, no. I don't think asking "why blog?" is synonymous with "why write?" (But I'm just thinking aloud here.)

Anyway. After I shoveled my way through those thoughts, I started wondering: why do I blog? Why have I blogged (horrible blogs, mind you) for four years? I have no answer. I'm a relatively private person, a bit hermit-ish given the moment, so it seems out of character. Why, then, do I write in a public venue? Am I a closet exhibitionist? Am I really self-absorbed?

...I think that rather than answer those questions, I'll just say that it's natural that I blog because it's natural to share information and knowledge.

Now, on to the memes.

Labels: ,

Monday, September 18, 2006

Other, Better Blogs

So, I've blogged before but never for a class and never with any particular purpose. In fact, my blog was the Seinfeld of the blogging world (only far less successful and funny and entertaining): it was a blog about nothing. I should probably read this to change my tune. Anyway, I suppose I'm going to think of this as my blog about something, or many things, but hopefully not nothing.

This blog, deemed one last year's "Blogging On" success stories, is quite entertaining. I'm attracted to these types of blogs, ones that blend the internal and the external, the personal and the communal. Brett makes his addiction to Dairy Queen just as interesting as the way the Bush administration "takes emotional issues in the country and exploits the hell out of them." I admire that.

Coffee Rhetoric had me with the title. She has a unique voice, a bit comical and a bit dark. With Coffee's blog, I noticed that, visually, I prefer blog posts that are broken into short paragraphs or bulleted lists, and ones that include photos or videos. I wonder if that means I'm lazy? I hope not. I'm a fan of words (and lots of 'em) but moreso when they're on the page than on the screen.

I noticed something (probably something quite obvious) when reading Nutmeg Grater: the speed with which information spreads. On Friday morning, I woke up, drove to get some coffee and heard on the radio that E-coli had been found in bagged spinach in Connecticut. I spent the drive home fretting about how there was bagged spinach in my fridge. Yikes stripes. Once home (and after throwing out my spinach), I started reading some blogs for class. The first entry on Nutmeg Grater's blog was about the E-coli outbreak. Damn. As soon as the news is out, someone's going to blog about it.

Labels:

Monday, September 11, 2006

And away we go.

Labels: